midknight wrote:Personally I think adjudicator paladin would be a much stronger build early ladder compared to an azurewraith build and at a fraction of the cost.
.
cnlnjzfjb wrote:huangyunshy wrote:Although your presentation and experience sharing is nice.
But Azure, one of the things I've always thought should be removed.
I think medianxl is starting to reduce the overall difficulty of the game
What attracts me to play medianxl is its high degree of difficulty and high operability. Instead of standing still and playing guessing games with T10 phoboss.
Also, if the Median xl team can see it, I'd like to suggest: It's up to the player to turn off TSW's gear display freely. Similar to the previously unviewable equipment of ladder players.
My vote here. I do agree that we need more endgame content difficulty. And players should be allowed to turn off/on their TSW as they wish.
Oh and ofc, I agree azure should be nerfed or removed. Or just like ppl mentioned above, nerf the drop rate of azure. But whatever, I dont care if it is nerfed or not, although I think it should.
RyougiShiki wrote:some ppl are just mixing deimoss 5 and deimoss 0, lol. also they ignore the success rate. if anyone try to farm lab they should know t10 stone is valuable and rare. every time fail with deimoss or even during the lab itself, it will be a great loss and need to do more work to do.
cnlnjzfjb wrote:Enigma wrote:I tried GT this season, the damage is actually pretty similar surprisingly. UH loses ALOT of vitality; storm lord is much worse than dragons blessing and lionheart does 625 vit compared to tainted's 300ish. Even so, the damage is slightly higher in UH spec due to the extra attack frame on DJ/cherub at a tradeoff of a much worse phoboss matchup. GT felt similar to cherub on packs (range seemed poor and damage comparable even at Lvl 44 GT) and you get a huge defensive/survivability loss. It also struggled badly on phoboss in UHC/GT; DJ with more Loma and UHC would probably do well enough on phoboss though. If I hadnt decided to hang up the boots for the season I probably would have grabbed a DJ relic and carried bellas for respec into UHC + DJ for deimoss. As for speed in labs; clearing 10's in 20-30mins with cherub and great phoboss matchup is better than GT imo.
I get ur point. But I do feel 10-target GT(ofc fortress on) with 5fpa and 140% weapon damage is way better than 4-target Cherub with 6fpa and 110% weapon damage in clearing labs from my experience, even u lose the strong dragon blessing for a weak stormlord. It is very worth it, in my opinion. And once u get more than 30k hp, phoboss should never be a thing for azure bd, cause u just never die. But if u do feel GT and Cherub are similar in clearing speed, Cherub surely is better. But I feel they are not that similar, at least. And the life regen for UHC with tainted is just better than HMP, together in 5f form with Farnham UMO it is also better than 6f form, which makes u actually more tanky facing phoboss. For any builds, once u get over 30k+ hp and 96 cold res, the key for survial against phoboss is not hp amount anymore. It is ur hp regen speed.
Ofc there is a big defence/vit loss as u mentioned, but in UHC form with these much regen, I dont feel any survivability loss than HMP form, I even feel better survivability, with tainted, solitude and Farnham in 5fpa. But anyway, just play whatever u like, one just dont die with azure so whatever.
Btw, the only right way to use GT is together with fortress on, that's why I said that meant anthor 2 relics if GT than Cherub. Fortress doubles the targets and seek range. Without fortress, GT is weak and unusable.
Enigma wrote:cnlnjzfjb wrote:Enigma wrote:I tried GT this season, the damage is actually pretty similar surprisingly. UH loses ALOT of vitality; storm lord is much worse than dragons blessing and lionheart does 625 vit compared to tainted's 300ish. Even so, the damage is slightly higher in UH spec due to the extra attack frame on DJ/cherub at a tradeoff of a much worse phoboss matchup. GT felt similar to cherub on packs (range seemed poor and damage comparable even at Lvl 44 GT) and you get a huge defensive/survivability loss. It also struggled badly on phoboss in UHC/GT; DJ with more Loma and UHC would probably do well enough on phoboss though. If I hadnt decided to hang up the boots for the season I probably would have grabbed a DJ relic and carried bellas for respec into UHC + DJ for deimoss. As for speed in labs; clearing 10's in 20-30mins with cherub and great phoboss matchup is better than GT imo.
I get ur point. But I do feel 10-target GT(ofc fortress on) with 5fpa and 140% weapon damage is way better than 4-target Cherub with 6fpa and 110% weapon damage in clearing labs from my experience, even u lose the strong dragon blessing for a weak stormlord. It is very worth it, in my opinion. And once u get more than 30k hp, phoboss should never be a thing for azure bd, cause u just never die. But if u do feel GT and Cherub are similar in clearing speed, Cherub surely is better. But I feel they are not that similar, at least. And the life regen for UHC with tainted is just better than HMP, together in 5f form with Farnham UMO it is also better than 6f form, which makes u actually more tanky facing phoboss. For any builds, once u get over 30k+ hp and 96 cold res, the key for survial against phoboss is not hp amount anymore. It is ur hp regen speed.
Ofc there is a big defence/vit loss as u mentioned, but in UHC form with these much regen, I dont feel any survivability loss than HMP form, I even feel better survivability, with tainted, solitude and Farnham in 5fpa. But anyway, just play whatever u like, one just dont die with azure so whatever.
Btw, the only right way to use GT is together with fortress on, that's why I said that meant anthor 2 relics if GT than Cherub. Fortress doubles the targets and seek range. Without fortress, GT is weak and unusable.
I found I was dying to phoboss (9/10) a fair bit with GT, although, I hadn't minmaxed it yet; maybe with a few more UMO's it'd have been different. The higher HP pool of the Holy spec makes solitude procs and potions do more healing. I didn't do the math on the benefits of the higher pool vs the extra frame of attack causing more procs when I tried GT, I didn't like the playstyle as much and felt far squishier losing a ton of life, defense and melee dev.
I didn't try fortress relic tbh.
Survivability was my priority as it had very decent clear and boss killing speed as it is. If the goal was the fastest clear speed and I was willing to compromise survivability, i'd have gone GT. As it was, I was labbing in 2-4 player games with a Scorp sin and a GT barb, so our clear speed was very good as a team, being a tank was the best use for me because it meant games where others died, I could finish the run and get the riftstones+UMOs.
Enigma wrote:I found I was dying to phoboss (9/10) a fair bit with GT, although, I hadn't minmaxed it yet; maybe with a few more UMO's it'd have been different. The higher HP pool of the Holy spec makes solitude procs and potions do more healing. I didn't do the math on the benefits of the higher pool vs the extra frame of attack causing more procs when I tried GT, I didn't like the playstyle as much and felt far squishier losing a ton of life, defense and melee dev.
I didn't try fortress relic tbh.
Survivability was my priority as it had very decent clear and boss killing speed as it is. If the goal was the fastest clear speed and I was willing to compromise survivability, i'd have gone GT. As it was, I was labbing in 2-4 player games with a Scorp sin and a GT barb, so our clear speed was very good as a team, being a tank was the best use for me because it meant games where others died, I could finish the run and get the riftstones+UMOs.