kakaraposa wrote:Sorry guys, but are u freaking kidding me??? (getting mad with blizzard not u )
Look at those insane minimum system reqs to play this thing!!! Just some sprinkles and some 3d modeling requiring a hi pc to play??? There are a lot of better graphics and bigger games like skyrim and doesn't take half of those reqs!!!
Maybe this can be low for first country ppl, but for a Brazilian guy like me, this is expensive as fk. No way buying a pc like this to play X.x
Minimum Requirements
Processor: Intel Core i3-3250/AMD FX-4350
GPU: Nvidia GTX 660/AMD Radeon HD 7850
RAM: 8 GB
HDD Space Requiried: 30 GB
Resolution: 1280 x 720
Operating System: Windows® 10
Recommended Specifications
Processor: Intel® Core i5-9600k/AMD Ryzen 5 2600
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060/AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Memory: 16 GB RAM
Storage: 30 GB
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Operating System: Windows® 10
kakaraposa wrote:Sorry guys, but are u freaking kidding me??? (getting mad with blizzard not u )
Look at those insane minimum system reqs to play this thing!!! Just some sprinkles and some 3d modeling requiring a hi pc to play??? There are a lot of better graphics and bigger games like skyrim and doesn't take half of those reqs!!!
Maybe this can be low for first country ppl, but for a Brazilian guy like me, this is expensive as fk. No way buying a pc like this to play X.x
Minimum Requirements
Processor: Intel Core i3-3250/AMD FX-4350
GPU: Nvidia GTX 660/AMD Radeon HD 7850
RAM: 8 GB
HDD Space Requiried: 30 GB
Resolution: 1280 x 720
Operating System: Windows® 10
Recommended Specifications
Processor: Intel® Core i5-9600k/AMD Ryzen 5 2600
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060/AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Memory: 16 GB RAM
Storage: 30 GB
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Operating System: Windows® 10
ApEEmPeROR wrote:kakaraposa wrote:Sorry guys, but are u freaking kidding me??? (getting mad with blizzard not u )
Look at those insane minimum system reqs to play this thing!!! Just some sprinkles and some 3d modeling requiring a hi pc to play??? There are a lot of better graphics and bigger games like skyrim and doesn't take half of those reqs!!!
Maybe this can be low for first country ppl, but for a Brazilian guy like me, this is expensive as fk. No way buying a pc like this to play X.x
Minimum Requirements
Processor: Intel Core i3-3250/AMD FX-4350
GPU: Nvidia GTX 660/AMD Radeon HD 7850
RAM: 8 GB
HDD Space Requiried: 30 GB
Resolution: 1280 x 720
Operating System: Windows® 10
Recommended Specifications
Processor: Intel® Core i5-9600k/AMD Ryzen 5 2600
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060/AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Memory: 16 GB RAM
Storage: 30 GB
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Operating System: Windows® 10
Those requirements are there to assure the customer that he will have a decent experience if he meets them. I'm pretty sure that it can probably run decent on lower specs, but they just don't want to take any risks here. Comparing it to Skyrim is actually a good idea because that will show you how different they are in terms of technology and why D2:R is having those requirements:
Skyrim
1) Mostly static lights with a few dynamic light sources here and there if the performance allows it(keep in mind that the game is pretty old and needed to be optimized for consoles).
2) No PBR
3) Mostly blurry low res textures until you download official packs or mods
4) You only fight a few enemies, which are only affected by either no or only a few effects(e.g. posion etc) most of the time which makes the computations easier
5) Single player, which means that only the actions/effects of one player need to be considered
D2:R
1) Afaik mostly or only dynamic lights
2) PBR
3) Judging by the needed storage size probably a lot of high res/poly textures/meshes
4) You fight hordes of enemies, sometimes up to ~50-100 on the screen, which can be under the influence of a lot of different effects(e.g auras, curses etc.). This is a major problem of any Diablo type game as we've seen with the performance problems in D3 and PoE and similar games.
5) Up to 8 players - which means that you can theoretically have 8 players at the same time performing performance heavy actions(e.g spells with crazy effects)
Dadplaysgames4 wrote:kakaraposa wrote:Sorry guys, but are u freaking kidding me??? (getting mad with blizzard not u )
Look at those insane minimum system reqs to play this thing!!! Just some sprinkles and some 3d modeling requiring a hi pc to play??? There are a lot of better graphics and bigger games like skyrim and doesn't take half of those reqs!!!
Maybe this can be low for first country ppl, but for a Brazilian guy like me, this is expensive as fk. No way buying a pc like this to play X.x
Minimum Requirements
Processor: Intel Core i3-3250/AMD FX-4350
GPU: Nvidia GTX 660/AMD Radeon HD 7850
RAM: 8 GB
HDD Space Requiried: 30 GB
Resolution: 1280 x 720
Operating System: Windows® 10
Recommended Specifications
Processor: Intel® Core i5-9600k/AMD Ryzen 5 2600
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060/AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Memory: 16 GB RAM
Storage: 30 GB
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Operating System: Windows® 10
yeahh..... pretty lame. Wait until Lost Ark hits the west then we will see who has the graphics in arpg
kakaraposa wrote:ApEEmPeROR wrote:kakaraposa wrote:Sorry guys, but are u freaking kidding me??? (getting mad with blizzard not u )
Look at those insane minimum system reqs to play this thing!!! Just some sprinkles and some 3d modeling requiring a hi pc to play??? There are a lot of better graphics and bigger games like skyrim and doesn't take half of those reqs!!!
Maybe this can be low for first country ppl, but for a Brazilian guy like me, this is expensive as fk. No way buying a pc like this to play X.x
Minimum Requirements
Processor: Intel Core i3-3250/AMD FX-4350
GPU: Nvidia GTX 660/AMD Radeon HD 7850
RAM: 8 GB
HDD Space Requiried: 30 GB
Resolution: 1280 x 720
Operating System: Windows® 10
Recommended Specifications
Processor: Intel® Core i5-9600k/AMD Ryzen 5 2600
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060/AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Memory: 16 GB RAM
Storage: 30 GB
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Operating System: Windows® 10
Those requirements are there to assure the customer that he will have a decent experience if he meets them. I'm pretty sure that it can probably run decent on lower specs, but they just don't want to take any risks here. Comparing it to Skyrim is actually a good idea because that will show you how different they are in terms of technology and why D2:R is having those requirements:
Skyrim
1) Mostly static lights with a few dynamic light sources here and there if the performance allows it(keep in mind that the game is pretty old and needed to be optimized for consoles).
2) No PBR
3) Mostly blurry low res textures until you download official packs or mods
4) You only fight a few enemies, which are only affected by either no or only a few effects(e.g. posion etc) most of the time which makes the computations easier
5) Single player, which means that only the actions/effects of one player need to be considered
D2:R
1) Afaik mostly or only dynamic lights
2) PBR
3) Judging by the needed storage size probably a lot of high res/poly textures/meshes
4) You fight hordes of enemies, sometimes up to ~50-100 on the screen, which can be under the influence of a lot of different effects(e.g auras, curses etc.). This is a major problem of any Diablo type game as we've seen with the performance problems in D3 and PoE and similar games.
5) Up to 8 players - which means that you can theoretically have 8 players at the same time performing performance heavy actions(e.g spells with crazy effects)
I'm pretty noob about hardwares, light effects and others, soh i couldn't really understand this (i'm gonna make a research to at least understand those things u mentioned hehe)
Maybe a comparision with d3 as u sayd... are the same points or is it something a little bit more easy to compare?