neocrescent wrote:if its possible bring back the jewel dupe recipe.....
what a horrible idea. single player exists for stuff like that.
neocrescent wrote:if its possible bring back the jewel dupe recipe.....
L H wrote:neocrescent wrote:if its possible bring back the jewel dupe recipe.....
what a horrible idea. single player exists for stuff like that.
aerial wrote:What I think kind of sucks on sin is ways, their damage number seems low, if you compare to for example barb. Max daedalus + 1pt thundergod barb already gets about same or more damage than maxed wotg.
Stacking double -enemy resist is tricky, as wdm sin that ignores poison, you want fire + lightning. You really have to go for "-enemy all resist" mod on items in that case to be efficient. And then cold pierce is "wasted" because you don't even have cold damage passive. I get that this was also bad when sin had 3 elemental ways, since then people just dumped almost all skill points into them and there was nothing left to invest in actual active skills.
nshade wrote:I have an idea. The "Ways" should be just a one passive skill in a general tree. But instead of adding a full rainbow damage it should add a particular elements depending on what weapon you are using and certain skills would give synergies to this skill.
Thanks for reading
Stereox wrote:nshade wrote:I have an idea. The "Ways" should be just a one passive skill in a general tree. But instead of adding a full rainbow damage it should add a particular elements depending on what weapon you are using and certain skills would give synergies to this skill.
Thanks for reading
IMO, rainbow damage like Fire/Cold/Light + Magic + Poison + Physical would be better for one-skill-only usage. They can do all areas without skill changing, but as you can see they perform worse on general area like TA.
If it's possible, my suggestion is to change them as added X% of physical damage as X element rather than flat damage. This would allow one way scaling damage with %Enhanced Weapon damage, with -%res to focus the damage.
I still doubt that %poison spell damage will increase damage source like Curare/Ways, and even if it does i think the wording should be changed to %Increased Poison Damage. You know, PoE style, as it is very specific and straightforward.
neocrescent wrote:L H wrote:neocrescent wrote:if its possible bring back the jewel dupe recipe.....
what a horrible idea. single player exists for stuff like that.
correct me if im wrong, are you saying that sp players dupe items all the time so putting back the dupe recipe is just a waste of time? im a sp player and i dont dupe items, i only dupe items if its allowed by the recipe. items like umo and other equips i get them from farming and trading with other players in the old forums.
L H wrote:neocrescent wrote:L H wrote:neocrescent wrote:if its possible bring back the jewel dupe recipe.....
what a horrible idea. single player exists for stuff like that.
correct me if im wrong, are you saying that sp players dupe items all the time so putting back the dupe recipe is just a waste of time? im a sp player and i dont dupe items, i only dupe items if its allowed by the recipe. items like umo and other equips i get them from farming and trading with other players in the old forums.
Many SP players dupe items, yes. putting that recipe into TSW would kill ladder even faster, since no one would have to farm for anything beyond one perfect jewel.
stuff like that has to be considered for multiplayer as well, not just needs on single player since you can basically do anything you want on single player anyways. I understand your desire for it, but it would be kinda dumb if you can just make 1 perfect roll jewel like 15% fhr/ias, 20% MF, 50 life, indestructible and just immediatly make 12 copies of it to fill gear.
SarahAustin wrote:If anything, merge the way passives into one with all elements and make it a uber skill, it should use the have another source thing from amazon bow passive. Then have poison way as a regular one.
neocrescent wrote:ok ok.... i was already expecting this kind of reply.